AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE DAY

Contrary to common notions, the 4th July is American Independence day but in reality it was British Independence day. The British, the founding fathers, the very base ingredient of the USA, the original founding colonies wanted Independence from London rule. You would be surprised how many people feel it was the US v UK. Now its our time. We desperately need Independence from the people we have allowed to Lord over us for millennia. We need a democratically elected head of state. I am aware of bloodlines and the reality of those ruling in the world. On the ground, we need change. Do we really need a royal family? How can we move forward with this set of people in position by birth!

WWW.REPUBLIC.ORG.UK

©SKC

Peter Davies Doncaster Mayor

Well Doncaster seems to have stepped back in time by electing an "English' democrat as its mayor. Immediately, the 'English' gentleman Peter Davies (with a Welsh name) seemed hell bent on appeasing the working mens club mentality more associated with the 1970's.

Davies (Englishman with a Welsh name) feels that people should speak in English whilst in England. Whilst I appreciate that it is important for people to speak the native lingo, I presume Davies, in all his Englishness, speaks fluently in every language on earth. And presumably Englishman DAVIES with a WELSH name speaks fluent Welsh in view of his Welsh routes and only speaks Welsh in Wales should he ever visit his half homeland. Presumably Englishman DAVIES feels that the 1 million British people who have emigrated to Spain during the tenure of this lousy excuse of a government should speak only Spanish and presumably, Englishman DAVIES with a WELSH name insists only on speaking the native lingo when he is packing his biggoted backside out of the country for his holidays. I am also guessing that

Englishman DAVIES with a Welsh name will insist that every worker in the UK paying taxes speak only English when he is living off their income tax in his dotage.

What a twat!

©SKC

Dame Joanna Lumley

This little treasure has proven that in a blink of an eye, she is more of a real woman than the like of  the vile Harriet Harman, Jacqui Smith and Fiona McTaggart could ever conspire to collectively be in a lifetime.  This woman should be honoured to the highest level for services to the UK.  She should be put before every single mysandrist MP as an example of womanhood.  She has always been a national treasure and will always be. Are you listening Harman?

©SKC

ETHNIC DIVERSITY

Just some kids.

I really like this picture because it shows happy Iraqi kids. They will have had to endure so much throughout their lives that over privileged spoilt uncaring and racist westerners cannot begin to understand. They make an immediate judgement because of how they look or where they are told these kids are from.

What really stands out to me is how diverse these kids are. Just look at all the skin tones and I bet not one of those kids would even know how to be racist even to the invaders from the west. They just happily accept one another. In the west, it seems people are hell bent pointing out the differences between the variety of indigenous and  newer peoples in Europe. Patronisingly unbelievable levels of measures that are clearly presented to peoples as an all embracing opportunity to stay right where you are. To keep them in their place. When they meet with objection from the proletariat they accuse them of being racist yet they clearly veil their own racist separatist measures with the notion of doing good. Yet it is pretty safe to say that the vast majority of new peoples would wish to assimilate with the general populous. Surely it has to be so. After all, in the last 50 years, peoples have arrived and had children and grand children and these measures are still in place and actively keeping peoples apart. Some sad people still see them as outsiders whilst completely neglecting to recall that they are indeed part of the British family (and I am being so kind in saying that) that once spanned the globe. To deny them their Britishness and therefore 'right' the same as everybody is like suddenly deciding Lincolnshire and the Cotswolds are no longer part of the country.

Think about it!

©SKC

NAZIR AHMED

Surely it's high time people woke up to the reality of the actual responsibility associated with driving. Never mind the mind numbing madness that enables people to actually use their mobiles and drive, but the actual notion by stupid pathetic people who feel they can drive safely whilst texting or indeed on a call. I see countless drivers daily driving whilst using their mobiles. I saw a guy only today driving with his head down seemingly texting. Last month, I saw a woman in the middle lane of the M62 slowing down in the middle lane whilst she sat staring at her mobile screen. Her passenger completely oblivious to the reality that they could soon be dead. Worse, killers! Wake up people for f**k sake. Why on earth do you think that YOU are ok to do this whilst joining in with the masses at condemning this practice to everybody else.  

The manufacturers should render mobiles useless whilst driving because the proles are just not capable of making the decision not to do this. They do not see the danger. 

Nazir Ahmed (another pillock to be awarded a completely irrelevant title that feeds into the pathetic outdated anachronistic society we have to endure) was jailed for 12 weeks today. Good luck to him. Whilst faultless to the death of the innocent road user, Ahmed was texting at the time. Therefore guilty of driving without due care and attention. Yes they are making an example of him and no it wasn't harsh enough.  His vermin twat of a solicitor felt it was too harsh. Well fat twatty solicitor to Nazir Ahmed, when you have decided which of your family you would be happy to see killed by some c*nt (for every single person who does this is a c*nt) on a mobile whilst driving, I will agree with you.

©SKC

ENGLISH AMERICA

There is nothing more annoying than somebody who tells little fibs in order to further a cause or a notion. Listening to BBC Radio 4's 'And the Academy Award Goes To' on Saturday 07.02.09,  Prof. Toby Miller - Media & Cultural Studies at UC Riverside California ( the state with the largest English population in the USA)  claimed that 'so few white Americans are descended of English stock.'  A total whitewash of the facts. 

At the 1980 census, English Americans made up 60 million of the former English colony and English founded and settled country.  Yet this commonly known fact was completely overlooked in order to create the notion of a love affair with English literature. More specifically Shakespeare. 

There seems to be a notion that Americans are not proud of their ancestry. Well in fact they are. but the base Americans (Anglo German) do not define themselves like those who came later like the Italian and Irish who seem zealous in the pride of their ancestry ( I speak as a fiercely proud Anglo Italian (Britialian))  Today 25 million people claim to be descended from the pilgrims from the Mayflower.

Note how former terrorist Gerry Adams referred to the Anglo US special relationship and drew comparison to the 'family of Irish descendents whilst dismissing the real state of ethnic US.  If the Irish in the US had founded and fought for self governance, then the situation would be very different.  Why are people so ill informed? Is it merely not an issue to the vast majority of ex English. After all, they left England for a reason. They eventually fought their countrymen to gain independence from English rule. Not how it is often portrayed as an Anglo US war. It was in reality the English fighting the English to gain independence from London rule.  George Washington was English.  Are so many people so thick. The vast majority of  US presidents shared blood with the Royal Heads of Europe with predominance to the English monarch.  The Englishness is so engrained in US life that there are those who firmly believe that the only independence the US got was the notion of independence. After all, the same people are still predominant leaders. When they don't tow the line, bang!

©SKC

ROBHINO

BBC

If the BBC was really impartial and really was wishing to remain so I could possibly understand a slight hesitation before broadcasting an appeal for Gazza. But they are clearly not. Maybe if the BBC was not over represented by Jews it would not think twice.

The most shameful day for the largest oldest and richest broadcaster in the world.

©SKC

LORD TAYLOR

Yet another reason to abolish this pathetic infantile system we have to endure in the UK.  Taylor showed himself for what he and his old unelected unaccountable set of thieving bastards are. A complete waste of air.

©SKC

Coincidence

Jonathan Ross

It was great to see Wossy back on the box Friday night. We howled at him and realised just how talented he is. Of course, the desperate for sales Daily Mail is still intent to demonise Mr Ross due to the incident last year with 'veteran' actor Andrew Sachs!  Screw you Daily Mail. Go and find another princess to haunt.

©SKC

THE ROYAL FAMILY

www.republic.org.uk

PRINCE HARRY

www.republic.org.uk

AXIS OF EVIL

MANDLESON

GEORGE W BUSH

Goodbye you muppet. Your puppeteers may have fooled the masses but people are waking up to the truth! 

©SKC

AL JAZEERA NEWS

RICHARD DAWKINS

I had the unpleasant experience of listening to Richard Dawkins give a 'talk' in the USA today that was originally recorded in 2002. 

Dawkins is a self outed atheist and as such subscribes to a belief system that he makes a vast fortune from. He discredits any other belief system and appeals to a tribalistic group of people who have the same tribalistic needs as do the enlightened. His belief is not to believe in a deity preferring to anoint himself or more specifically scientists with the a god like status. He believes that he has been trapped in a world which prevents him from expressing his atheism and drops in names like Darwin (his god?) in every other paragraph along with the word 'believe' a lot. 

In this talk, Dawkins is a hit before he opens his mouth, because his audience are there to cheer and applaud him. They want to be in his club, they want HIS bible to carry around, they want to feel they belong.

Like so many pretentious English people, Dawkins uses his Englishness as a tool of appeal. The Americans tend to love the English and their funny little accents. They all live in mansions drinking tea and eating cucumber sandwiches. They all speak like Dawkins. He expresses the love affair with the US and kisses their American backsides at every opportunity. Thus engaging with his already awestruck audience by constantly appealing to their intelligence and stroking their over inflated egos by telling them they are sophisticated and throws in words like parsimonious and anthropocentricism as though its only they that would understand him and not the god believing proletariat. This from a man with a funny accent from a mansion in little old England. Yet clearly, this ill mannered buffoon is looking down his nose at his audience and is merely patronising them in order to increase the sale of his book by appealing to the very base psyche Americans believe that theirs is the greatest country on earth and he tells them so. He always uses child like notions to stress his point and uses it as a psychological tool on his audience. They don't believe in 'jew jew' at the bottom of the sea or the fairies as he mentions here. 

He appeals to self guilt, but I am sure guilt has been applied to all children at some point in their lives, religious or otherwise. He obviously carries this around with him and is looking for a vent to throw this mysterious dark veil from himself and pat himself on his shoulder and say there there Richard there is no god so I need not feel guilty. Maybe Dawkins is just trying to over throw an overly religious family and stick the proverbial finger up at its over privileged background.

In this recording, Dawkins is clearly onto a winner with an audience desperate to meet their prophet and welcome his patronising manner. He is quick to dismiss the creator but fails miserably, indeed fails to attempt to prove its none existence. Dawkins' preference is to patronise the believers and makes reference to unintelligent people (the proletariat lynch mob) confusing a pediatrician with a paedophile as though their was some link between it and the none existence of god. Or was this once again a tribalistic all embracing tool to seek approval from his audience and foster a notion of enlightened superiority as only an Oxford educated buffoon could whilst masking his frequent twittery with an essence of eccentricity.

Despite all of this, I really despise Dawkins for two reasons. One, he proves absolutely nothing and two, he shows scant regard for believers. More specifically the people whose lives are drawing to an end and indeed rely on their religion for personal comfort at this difficult time and find great comfort from it. These people are quietly fearful of Dawkins' unbelievably closeted beliefs. For whilst they are just that a belief, that is little comfort for the millions of peoples who need such comfort.  Having said all that, Dawkins' book will not stand the test of time like the Holy Qu'ran or the bible. It will only ever reach short lived cult like status which was not Dawkins' plan. Afterall, he was hoping to bestow god like status on scientists, and failed miserably. 

©SKC

AS OF 04.01.09